Court will adopt maps without considering partisanship, will seek “least changes”
The News: The Wisconsin Supreme Court issued an opinion in Johnson v. WEC, a Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty (WILL) redistricting case, that adopts criteria for the redistricting process. The decision ...
WILL filed original action on behalf of four Wisconsin voters living in malapportioned districts
The News: The Wisconsin Supreme Court agreed to take an original action filed by the Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty (WILL) that would allow the court to take jurisdiction of the ...
Original action, on behalf of four voters, requests judicial apportionment plan
The News: The Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty (WILL) filed an original action with the Wisconsin Supreme Court urging the Court to declare the current legislative districts unconstitutional and establish ...
The Cap Times has assembled a panel of experts to discuss that question in a virtual forum from on Wednesday, May 26. The panelists are:
Sachin Chheda, director and co-founder of the Fair Elections Project
Moon Duchin, a mathematics professor at Tufts University who runs the MGGG ...
WUWM talks with Rick Esenberg on the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Gill v. Whitford, Wisconsin's legislative redistricting case.
Justices ruled that the plaintiffs were trying to show that the maps violate the rights of all state voters – instead of showing how the maps affect them ...
Rick Esenberg writing at RealClearPolitics on why the U.S. Supreme Court punted on Wisconsin's redistricting case, Gill v. Whitford:
In the eagerly awaited redistricting case, Gill v. Whitford, the United States Supreme Court vacated a lower court ruling directing the Wisconsin legislature to ...